<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Words into Type? Anyone?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/114524/Words-into-Type-Anyone/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Words into Type? Anyone?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:15:19 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:15:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Words into Type? Anyone?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/114524/Words-into-Type-Anyone</link>	
		<description>Does anyone still use Words into Type? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; CMS is going strong, AP, AMA, and APA obviously have built-in staying power, but I haven&apos;t cracked my WIT in several years. (I mostly do book copyediting.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.114524</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:53:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scratch</dc:creator>
		
			<category>editing</category>
		
			<category>stylemanual</category>
		
			<category>copyediting</category>
		
			<category>proofreading</category>
		
			<category>publishing</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: mattbucher</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/114524/Words-into-Type-Anyone#1644401</link>	
		<description>I work for a large publisher and we still keep the third edition on the shelves, issue it to all editors and copyeditors, but I don&apos;t think anyone really uses it. Has it been updated since 1974?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.114524-1644401</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:15:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mattbucher</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: smich</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/114524/Words-into-Type-Anyone#1644422</link>	
		<description>I still use it, even though it is outdated. It still has a lot of useful information.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.114524-1644422</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:26:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smich</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: scratch</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/114524/Words-into-Type-Anyone#1644448</link>	
		<description>Matt--Worldcat and Amazon have listings for a fourth edition c/r 1999, but I don&apos;t believe it. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Smich--Agreed, but are you using it for personal reference? Mostly I want to know if any publishers rely on it as their manual of choice.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.114524-1644448</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:48:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scratch</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: penchant</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/114524/Words-into-Type-Anyone#1644517</link>	
		<description>A copy or two are on the reference shelf and scattered about here at work (a university press). But I don&apos;t think I&apos;ve ever seen anyone use it (myself included). We are all issued the CMoS, we science journals editors get the CSE manual, and our medical journals editors get the AMA guide.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just asked a friend, a books editor here. Her response was &quot;nope, never!&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.114524-1644517</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:52:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>penchant</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: languagehat</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/114524/Words-into-Type-Anyone#1644726</link>	
		<description>I love my battered old copy, but I haven&apos;t had to use it professionally in almost 20 years.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.114524-1644726</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:30:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: misanthropicsarah</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/114524/Words-into-Type-Anyone#1644874</link>	
		<description>i don&apos;t think so. at the 3-4 publishing type places i&apos;ve worked in the past 6 years, i don&apos;t think i&apos;ve even &lt;em&gt;seen &lt;/em&gt;a copy of it. i think i may have seen on in the writing center in college....</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.114524-1644874</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:02:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>misanthropicsarah</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
