Food-borne illness was until the last couple of centuries a major killer of humans on earth. Its toll cannot be overstated and cannot be dismissed as an example of observer bias. What stopped it in its tracks was scientific understanding of public and private food hygiene, and then the implementation of that understanding in practice.
When you eat food that may have spoiled, forgoing food that is known to be safe in favor of the possibly-spoiled food, you simply reject these advances, and in doing so inherit the morbidity and mortality profile of ignorant cavemen.
You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments
It might be okay, but is it really worth the risk?
(the answer is no.)
posted by mesh gear fox at 4:01 PM on February 11 [1 favorite]