<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Any recent legal decisions I should know about?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/113765/Any-recent-legal-decisions-I-should-know-about/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Any recent legal decisions I should know about?</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 09:15:12 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 09:15:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Any recent legal decisions I should know about?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/113765/Any-recent-legal-decisions-I-should-know-about</link>	
		<description>A New York State bar exam question &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Having piddled around doing other things the last few years, I find myself studying for the bar with old law outlines.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Is there anything recent from either the Supreme Court or New York State Court of Appeals that I might be tested on?  My books cover Kelo, so anything more recent than that.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.113765</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 09:08:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakish_yet_centered</dc:creator>
		
			<category>barexam</category>
		
			<category>supremecourt</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: aswego</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/113765/Any-recent-legal-decisions-I-should-know-about#1633997</link>	
		<description>Probably not, but you should read the results of Hammon v. Indiana and Washington v. Davis.  They&apos;re both Crawford v. Washington progeny from a couple years ago that are tailor-made for exam hypos.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.113765-1633997</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 09:15:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aswego</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: decathecting</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/113765/Any-recent-legal-decisions-I-should-know-about#1634120</link>	
		<description>I have no idea how bar examiners choose questions, but if you&apos;re looking for cases more recent than 2005 that have significantly changed the legal landscape, read DC vs. Heller. And you should probably follow the progression of cases about enemy combatants/detention/6th Amendment rights that have been decided over the last several years.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.113765-1634120</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:55:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>decathecting</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: rakish_yet_centered</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/113765/Any-recent-legal-decisions-I-should-know-about#1634138</link>	
		<description>Yes decathecting, I meant to be asking about changing the legal landscape.  I qualified with &quot;might be tested on&quot; because I&apos;m not too worried about the legal landscapes regarding legal areas not covered on the bar exam</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.113765-1634138</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:10:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakish_yet_centered</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Jaltcoh</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/113765/Any-recent-legal-decisions-I-should-know-about#1634394</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt; if you&apos;re looking for cases more recent than 2005 that have significantly changed the legal landscape, read DC vs. Heller. And you should probably follow the progression of cases about enemy combatants/detention/6th Amendment rights that have been decided over the last several years.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m not sure this is such great advice. The NY bar examiners hate controversial issues or areas of law that are still unsettled.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.113765-1634394</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:47:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaltcoh</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: mercredi</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/113765/Any-recent-legal-decisions-I-should-know-about#1634959</link>	
		<description>hudson v. michigan, maybe?  There&apos;s a couple of years&apos; lag, though, so that might not make it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.113765-1634959</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:52:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mercredi</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
