To boil or not to boil
February 2, 2009 4:39 PM
Subscribe
My wife thinks we should be boiling all drinking water here in Pittsburgh, I don't think it's necessary. What references should we look up, or experiments can we run, to determine what to do?
The water we get in Pittsburgh is hard water. My wife is concerned that drinking hard water may be bad for our health (e.g., kidney stones). She is also concerned about micro-organisms in the water. As a result, she thinks we should boil all water before drinking. She also thinks we may want to look into getting those gigantic water jugs for all drinking water.
I've always drunk tap water all my life, and think that boiling the water here is a waste of time and energy.
We are both holding our same positions here. What kinds of evidence and/or references can we gather to understand which position is correct?
Keep in mind that our habits come from cultural differences (I grew up in the US and my family never boiled the water, my wife grew up in China and they always boiled the water).
posted by jasonhong to food & drink (23 comments total)
In the US, you don't need to boil the water unless there's some sort of catastrophe (flooding, toxic spill into the water table, etc.) that introduces bacteria, etc. into the water source.
posted by The Michael The at 4:50 PM on February 2 [1 favorite]