<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: A Microsoft product that thinks it knows what's best for me? Perish!</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110345/A-Microsoft-product-that-thinks-it-knows-whats-best-for-me-Perish/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post A Microsoft product that thinks it knows what's best for me? Perish!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:41:15 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:41:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: A Microsoft product that thinks it knows what&apos;s best for me? Perish!</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110345/A-Microsoft-product-that-thinks-it-knows-whats-best-for-me-Perish</link>	
		<description>When I do Add -&amp;gt; Existing Web Site in Visual Studio 2008, if the existing site was created in an earlier version of .net (say 2.0 and I&apos;m running 3.5) Visual Studio automatically starts an update wizard to convert the site to 3.5. How do I turn off this behavior so that it simply imports the web site without updating it?

I know this is possible because the first time I did this it happened flawlessly, but at the time I didn&apos;t un-check the &quot;automatically update sites next time&quot; check box. Gah.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110345</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:13:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChasFile</dc:creator>
		
			<category>microsoft</category>
		
			<category>visualstudio</category>
		
			<category>net</category>
		
			<category>import</category>
		
			<category>website</category>
		
			<category>site</category>
		
			<category>project</category>
		
			<category>update</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: cschneid</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110345/A-Microsoft-product-that-thinks-it-knows-whats-best-for-me-Perish#1587927</link>	
		<description>I don&apos;t have it next to me, so I can&apos;t tell you for sure, but you can always downgrade it back once it&apos;s opened.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There are 2 things to watch out for.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1) The project version.  2008 stores metadata differently than 2003 or 2005.  So once you upgrade the project to 2008, you probably can&apos;t downgrade it back.  This has bitten me when working with other developers.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2) The .NET target.  This affects the deployment environment, and what APIs are available.  If you right click the project, and dig through the settings, there&apos;s one where you can define what the target .NET version is. It&apos;ll make sure to import the correct library versions (verify that under the imports section of the project tree), and will keep you from using new APIs (ie, lambdas, etc.).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My terminology here is all wrong, but that&apos;s basically what I did to deal with it (just re-downgrade).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110345-1587927</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:41:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cschneid</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
