<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: descent of gould</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post descent of gould</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 02:12:14 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 02:12:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: descent of gould</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould</link>	
		<description>Science reading for the informed layperson. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Ive been reading a bit of Gould and have really enjoyed how he dealt with complex discoveries at the cusp of scientific research - making it accessible without watering it down while also leaving in the minute details that make it fascinating.  The fact that it was written in the 80&apos;s however means that its a bit out of date.  I actually enjoyed finishing his essays, then spending an hour or so catching up on the latest - so I&apos;ll continue to read his stuff, but i was wondering if there was something on par that is being written currently - &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
something with his wit and charm would be lovely, but more importantly, up to date.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I have a couple science blogs book marked, but they are unfortunately largely devoted to hating fundementalist christians and their efforts.  I am a member of that choir - don&apos;t get me wrong - but id like a little more meat you know?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
can you recommend some blogs, or books/authors which would fit my needs?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 01:40:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nihlton</dc:creator>
		
			<category>science</category>
		
			<category>evolution</category>
		
			<category>gould</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: 0xFCAF</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1587639</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/ref=ntt_athr_dp_sr_1?_encoding=UTF8&amp;search-type=ss&amp;index=books&amp;field-author=Brian%20Greene&quot;&gt;Brian Greene&lt;/a&gt; is writing some pretty good books about modern physics. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/ref=ntt_athr_dp_sr_1?_encoding=UTF8&amp;search-type=ss&amp;index=books&amp;field-author=James%20Gleick&quot;&gt;James Gleick&lt;/a&gt; (particularly in &lt;i&gt;Chaos&lt;/i&gt; and his Feynman book) does a great job with mathematical history, which is often obscure enough to seem new. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0385493622/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Fermat&apos;s Enigma&lt;/a&gt; is about a centuries-old hypothesis that only was only recently proven by modern mathematics and is an enjoyable read. It really does take a few years for science to really solidify and completely understand newish discoveries, so things from the 80&apos;s really aren&apos;t that out of date. Most lay people would have a very hard time understanding physics that was discovered in the 1950&apos;s.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1587639</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 02:12:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>0xFCAF</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: trip and a half</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1587657</link>	
		<description>I buy the annual version of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0061340413/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;this book&lt;/a&gt; each year.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Also, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciam.com/&quot;&gt;Scientific American&lt;/a&gt; magazine is usually a pretty good bet for up-to-date stuff.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1587657</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:07:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>trip and a half</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: aheckler</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1587664</link>	
		<description>You may enjoy Natalie Angier&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0618242953/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Canon&lt;/a&gt;, although it&apos;s received mixed reviews.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1587664</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:43:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aheckler</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: xchmp</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1587666</link>	
		<description>As a contrast to Gould, you might enjoy &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin%27s_Dangerous_Idea&quot;&gt;Darwin&apos;s Dangerous Idea&lt;/a&gt; by Daniel Dennett.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1587666</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:47:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>xchmp</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: mippy</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1587667</link>	
		<description>My SO is big into this stuff and loves Steven Pinker (I&apos;ve only read The Language Instinct) and a book called Conversations on Consciousness which features several science writers - might give you some places to follow up on.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1587667</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:49:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mippy</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: canine epigram</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1587704</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m not sure if it&apos;s too basic for you, but Bill Bryson&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/076790818X/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;A Short History of Nearly Everything&lt;/a&gt; would be a great jumping off point. He reviews all the big foundational discoveries in major areas of science in a really entertaining way.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1587704</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 05:12:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>canine epigram</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: loosemouth</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1587711</link>	
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://ksjtracker.mit.edu/&quot;&gt;Knight Science Journalism Tracker&lt;/a&gt;  comments on the value of today&apos;s science journalism and can help you find good science journalists.  It has an RSS feed.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1587711</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 05:21:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>loosemouth</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: hydropsyche</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1587713</link>	
		<description>A lot of the modern direction evolutionary biology is taking is &quot;evo devo&quot;--the relationship between evolutionary and developmental biology.  Gould wrote a book on that a long time ago &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0674639413/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Ontogeny and Phylogeny&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Sean Carroll is a biologist working in that area right now who is quite a good writer--check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393327795/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Endless Forms Most Beautiful&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My other very favorite modern book on the evolution of our understanding of evolution is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0822324725/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Evolution&apos;s Eye&lt;/a&gt; by Susan Oyama (which I&apos;ve recommended on Metafilter a number of times), who talks a lot about environmental effects and other epigenetics and culture and rethinking the levels of selection and the importance of genotype and phenotype.  Oyama is a psychologist, so a lot of her work is directly related to the effects of genes and environment on the human mind.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Richard Lewontin is a primatologist who works along very similar lines.  I haven&apos;t read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0674006771/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Triple Helix&lt;/a&gt; but I&apos;ve heard great things about it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1587713</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 05:29:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hydropsyche</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: pyotrstolypin</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1587735</link>	
		<description>Another vote for A History of Nearly Everything, but you might also enjoy the prolific &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Matt-Ridley/e/B000AQ6M5Q&quot;&gt;Matt Ridley.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
John Brockman&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edge.org/&quot;&gt;Edge&lt;/a&gt; site brings together a host of excellent science writers.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Don&apos;t forget &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Oliver-Sacks/e/B000APZZY6&quot;&gt;Oliver Sacks&lt;/a&gt;! Or Steven Mithen, especially &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0674025598/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Singing Neaderthals&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I enjoyed Susan Blackmore&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0195179595/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Conversations on Consciousness&lt;/a&gt;, which brings together most of the leading thinkers on the subject.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And there&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0143113100/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Brain That Changes Itself&lt;/a&gt; by Norman Doidge. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Enjoy!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1587735</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 06:10:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pyotrstolypin</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: otio</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1587763</link>	
		<description>Nobel laureate Frank Wilczek&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lightnessofbeingbook.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Lightness of Being&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2008) is a very lively and readable survey of the frontiers of particle physics. It&apos;s a good primer for understanding what scientists are hoping to discover with the Large Hadron Collider.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1587763</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 06:33:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>otio</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: kcm</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1587839</link>	
		<description>Two more physics books that are well-regarded:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del,_Escher,_Bach&quot;&gt;G&#246;del, Escher, Bach&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/055326382X/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Dancing Wu-Li Masters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The Bryson book mentioned above was both a great read and a great source for more books as he is presenting an overview of a range of topics and he (generally) mentions further reading for each, should you be interested.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1587839</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:35:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kcm</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: kcm</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1587846</link>	
		<description>More Simon Singh:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0385495323/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Code Book&lt;/a&gt; (crypto)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0007162219/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Big Bang&lt;/a&gt; (cosmology)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
More math:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0374529353/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Riemann Hypothesis&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0738202592/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Mathematical Mysteries: The Beauty and Magic of Numbers&lt;/a&gt; (a bit advanced)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0452288533/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Unknown Quantity: A Real and Imaginary History of Algebra&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1587846</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:41:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kcm</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: vytae</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1587879</link>	
		<description>Though I&apos;m not a fan of his anti-religious zealotry, Richard Dawkins&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;The Selfish Gene&lt;/a&gt; and other writings on biology and evolution are very interesting and well-done.  Though they are rather old at this point, the points he makes (especially in correcting common misunderstandings of evolution) are still very much valid.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I used to loooove Discover magazine for this kind of stuff, too.  Like any magazine, each issue had collections of little snippets, page-long columns, and full-length articles about new discoveries in a wide variety of scientific disciplines.  I don&apos;t have time to read it anymore, but I miss it a lot.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1587879</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:03:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vytae</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: flawsekno</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1587917</link>	
		<description>Feynman&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0465023924/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Six Easy Pieces&lt;/a&gt; (and his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0465023932/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Six Not-So-Easy Pieces&lt;/a&gt;) may be too basic for you, but Feynman always has &quot;wit and charm&quot; in spades.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Seconding Dawkins (for science, not for atheism), but if you already know the basic concepts of evolution, I&apos;d recommend &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/061861916X/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Ancestor&apos;s Tale&lt;/a&gt; over The Selfish Gene for being broader and more recent. It traces our ancestry through time and evolutionary space and touches on a ton of topics on the way - pretty great stuff.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Eric Kandel is kind of annoying, but his book/autobiography &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393329372/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;In Search of Memory&lt;/a&gt; does a good job of surveying the history of neurology and the current study of learning and memory.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Lastly, remember Jonathan Weiner! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/067973337X/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Beak of the Finch&lt;/a&gt; is his more well-known work, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0679763902/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Time, Love, Memory&lt;/a&gt;, which is about Seymour Benzer and his fruit flies, holds a special place in my heart.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1587917</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:34:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>flawsekno</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Midnight Rambler</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1587987</link>	
		<description>As far as blogs though some good ones are:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/&quot;&gt;Pharyngula&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/&quot;&gt;Bad Astronomy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/&quot;&gt;The Loom&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Sandwalk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
and really anything at &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/&quot;&gt;Scienceblogs&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you want the more meatier entries just just look for the &quot;Research Blogging&quot; sign.  It means that the post is specifically about peer reviewed research.  You can find them aggregated &lt;a href=&quot;http://researchblogging.org/post-list/list/date/all&quot;&gt;here &lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1587987</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:15:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Midnight Rambler</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Lesser Shrew</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1588045</link>	
		<description>The Loom is super duper and Zimmer&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0743230388/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Soul Made Flesh&lt;/a&gt; is one of the most vivid science books I&apos;ve read. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.natalieangier.com/main.php?id=other_books&quot;&gt;Natalie Angier&lt;/a&gt; may not write at the high level you are looking for, but she has some good stuff.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1588045</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:43:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lesser Shrew</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: chrisamiller</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1588108</link>	
		<description>Ed Yong blogs at &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/&quot;&gt;Not Exactly Rocket Science&lt;/a&gt; and writes exactly the kind of accessible material you&apos;re looking for.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1588108</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:40:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chrisamiller</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jeeves</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1588140</link>	
		<description>Whenever people ask this, I always send them to&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twistedphysics.typepad.com/cocktail_party_physics/2008/08/the-great-pop-s.html&quot;&gt;Cocktail Party Physics | the great pop-sci book project&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
and&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Cosmic Variance | The Thousand Best Popular-Science Books?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
From these two you&apos;ll also find suggestions in the blog comments and links to other people&apos;s similar lists. Happy reading!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
P.S. No one has yet said the obvious, so I&apos;ll say it: Carl Sagan. Everyone knows &lt;u&gt;Cosmos&lt;/u&gt; and &lt;u&gt;Pale Blue Dot&lt;/u&gt;, but I&apos;ve felt for a long time that &lt;u&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0345409469/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/u&gt; should be required reading for high school and college students. Or anyone. To me, it&apos;s one of the best of the last twenty years.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
P.P.S. The two most popular recent books among the small set of people I know are by physicists: &lt;u&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060531096/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Warped Passages&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/u&gt; by Lisa Randall and &lt;u&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393058581/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Elegant Universe&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/u&gt; by Brian Greene.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1588140</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:13:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeeves</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: pseudostrabismus</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1588171</link>	
		<description>Nthing Dawkins&apos; science writing.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393315703/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Blind Watchmaker&lt;/a&gt; is a fantastic read.  &lt;br&gt;
I also liked &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.maryroach.net/stiff.html&quot;&gt;Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers&lt;/a&gt;, by Mary Roach.&lt;br&gt;
Since you asked for more current writing, I&apos;ll suggest the very recently published &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/11/qa-how-biology.html&quot;&gt;How Biology and Technology Shape Sex and War&lt;/a&gt;- I haven&apos;t read it myself but I&apos;ve really liked several articles by its co-author Thomas Hayden.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1588171</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:41:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pseudostrabismus</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: nihlton</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1588220</link>	
		<description>there is enough here to keep my busy for AGES!  thanks for the wonderful response mefi.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1588220</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:14:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nihlton</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: tickingclock</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1589019</link>	
		<description>Fantastic thread. Here are a few cognitive science/neuroscience suggestions: &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0688172172/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Phantoms in the Brain&lt;/a&gt; by V.S. Ramachandran &amp;amp; Sandra Blakeslee.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0014T9NDG/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Gut Feelings&lt;/a&gt; by Gerd Gigerenzer.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0316010669/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Blink&lt;/a&gt; by Malcolm Gladwell.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/014303622X/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Descartes&apos; Error&lt;/a&gt; by Antonio Damasio.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0140230122/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The User Illusion&lt;/a&gt; by Tor Norretranders.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Not sure if this counts, but here is a social science suggestion:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0156033909/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Mistakes Were Made, but Not by Me&lt;/a&gt; by Carol Tavris &amp;amp; Elliot Aronson.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1589019</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:58:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tickingclock</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: wei</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1589090</link>	
		<description>Up to date is relative: for sure most books here aren&apos;t cutting edge science, but then cutting edge doesn&apos;t really translate well into popular science most of the time. Evidence: many books here are also listed in &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/53962/What-are-some-of-the-best-laymans-books-on-the-latest-advances-in-physics&quot;&gt;a thread two years&lt;/a&gt; old.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Neuroscience: Oliver Sack&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0684853949/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Man Who Mistook His Wife For a Hat&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.librarything.com/work/12889&quot;&gt;Consciousness Explained&lt;/a&gt; (Daniel Dennett), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1405160004/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Blackwell Companion to Consciousness&lt;/a&gt;, Shannon Moffett&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1565124235/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Three Pound Enigma&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1589090</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:05:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wei</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: oqrothsc</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/110326/descent-of-gould#1589096</link>	
		<description>Amazing popsci blog about the brain by the author of Proust was a Neuroscientist (great book btw): &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/cortex/&quot;&gt;The Frontal Cortex&lt;/a&gt;.  Awesome thread!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.110326-1589096</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:09:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>oqrothsc</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
