<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Should we switch from domain hack to dot com?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/107780/Should-we-switch-from-domain-hack-to-dot-com/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Should we switch from domain hack to dot com?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:15:46 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:15:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Should we switch from domain hack to dot com?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/107780/Should-we-switch-from-domain-hack-to-dot-com</link>	
		<description>Should we switch from domain hack to dot com? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; For a year we&apos;ve been blogging about concerts (posting reviews/photos) and for the last 6 months I&apos;ve been learning a lot about SEO. However, our traffic is still pretty dismal. We&apos;re averaging about 120 visits/day. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
One of the biggest problems is that it doesn&apos;t seem like we can get any traction on Google. Immediately after we publish a post it will rocket to the top for our keywords, but after 24 hours it&apos;s fallen away to page 3.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m starting to think the problem could be our domain hack. It&apos;s a .be (belgium) site that uses a subdomain, domain, ending to form a word, so essentially something like: met.afilt.er&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The thing is we own the .com domain for our word, so we could switch it to metafilter [dot] com.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Will we rank higher in Google if we switch? Are .coms inherently more trusted domains? Compelling reasons for switching/staying?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.107780</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:07:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jrholt</dc:creator>
		
			<category>seo</category>
		
			<category>websites</category>
		
			<category>domain</category>
		
			<category>hack</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: Tomorrowful</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/107780/Should-we-switch-from-domain-hack-to-dot-com#1553361</link>	
		<description>Well, people are often confused by non-com/net/org domain names. Google, however, doesn&apos;t care at all.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It&apos;s important to be aware, however, that Google actively discourages what it considers manipulation of its search results. If your SEO is &apos;tricky&apos; enough, it&apos;ll probably actually &lt;i&gt;damage&lt;/i&gt; your standings.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.107780-1553361</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:15:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomorrowful</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Brennus</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/107780/Should-we-switch-from-domain-hack-to-dot-com#1553399</link>	
		<description>Do a redirect from the domain hack to the .com address in which a 301 status is returned by the web server. This way, Google does not punish you for having two domains with the same content.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.107780-1553399</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:32:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brennus</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jrholt</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/107780/Should-we-switch-from-domain-hack-to-dot-com#1553533</link>	
		<description>Can somebody cite to something that proves Google doesn&apos;t care about domain hacks? My inclination is that geocentric domains aren&apos;t doing as well in google.com (for instance, we rank a LOT higher in google.be).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.107780-1553533</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:34:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jrholt</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: dunkadunc</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/107780/Should-we-switch-from-domain-hack-to-dot-com#1553581</link>	
		<description>Then move your content to the .com and use the .be as a redirect.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.107780-1553581</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:06:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dunkadunc</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jenkinsEar</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/107780/Should-we-switch-from-domain-hack-to-dot-com#1553774</link>	
		<description>Assuming your site is Mel.opho.be (from your past history of questions), there are a few things you could be doing to help your traffic score for keywords, at least that I could see:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
- there don&apos;t seem to be any meta keywords or descriptions on your home page or any sub pages.&lt;br&gt;
- there don&apos;t seem to be any alt tags in your article images.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
do you have rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on for posted URL&apos;s in comments? &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Great looking site, though- good luck with it!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.107780-1553774</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:10:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenkinsEar</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: FlamingBore</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/107780/Should-we-switch-from-domain-hack-to-dot-com#1562328</link>	
		<description>Put it on the .com. domain hacks, especially with a subdomain are just hard. People F up the links all the time and gathering back links is still important.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.107780-1562328</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:07:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FlamingBore</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
