$1000 hanging over my head
November 20, 2008 9:09 AM
Subscribe
Am I screwing myself by not filing a motion in court? Does it really matter in the long run?
I was served papers by a rental car agency for the outstanding balance (just over $1000) of an accident one year ago in which the rental car I was driving was totaled. My 30 days to respond is nearly up.
Someone else cause the accident (documented in State Police report). After salvage, her insurance co. paid all but the $1000+ because they claim it's "unreasonable towing charges" (towed from WA to OR). Rental car co. says I am responsible for the amount, no matter what, because my name is on the contract.
The insurance co. has contacted me saying they are negotiating with the rental car co. (after I filed a small claims court claim against the accident-causing party), but things are moving slowly. I suspect the rental car co. is stalling so they automatically "win" when I don't file a motion in time in response to the papers they filed.
The thing is, I only make $8/hr working less than 25 hours a week and I'm not going to hire a lawyer at $150+/hr to get this settled. And I am reluctant to even pay the $50 motion filing fee to submit a download-it-now legal form off the internets... it could all be for nothing. I live in a different state from where the accident occurred and from where the papers were filed in court (three different states).
I am not worried about the decision against me ruining my credit. I am building my own tiny house debt-free and don't/won't need a car loan.
Worse case scenario, they say I owe $1000+ and I never pay?
Of course the lawyer that I did contact recommended I hire a lawyer, but I told him I couldn't afford it.
Considering most of you are not lawyers, what would you do?
(See my profile, previous questions for more background.)
posted by hulahulagirl to law & government (23 comments total)
1 user marked this as a favorite
If the insurance company is disputing a payment, but the other party is found 100% liable, then it seems to me that they would be responsible for paying the amount not covered by the insurer. Of course, this may vary if they're not 100% liable or there's some other weird procedural thing going on. IANAL.
posted by Inspector.Gadget at 9:19 AM on November 20, 2008