<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: The Wasteland shouldn't look THIS bad...</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105828/The-Wasteland-shouldnt-look-THIS-bad/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post The Wasteland shouldn't look THIS bad...</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 19:31:12 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 19:31:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: The Wasteland shouldn&apos;t look THIS bad...</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105828/The-Wasteland-shouldnt-look-THIS-bad</link>	
		<description>Mid-range graphics card recommendations. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I just picked up Fallout 3 and my once-passable gaming PC with its Radeon X850 XT has finally met its match. I really can&apos;t play the game without bumping down the resolution and all of the settings and that&apos;s just not acceptable so I would like to pick up a mid-range graphics card that will let me crank up the graphics as much as I can.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Trouble is, I built this thing over two years ago and I&apos;m very out of touch with the graphics cards of today. The rest of my computer is fine: AMD X2 3800+, 2 gigs of decent RAM, and almost a TB of space on two SATA drives.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Fallout 3 is the most graphically-intense game I&apos;m playing right now. I would like to try Far Cry 2 and possibly CoD 4 at some point but those aren&apos;t high priority games. The only other new game I might be buying soon is Left 4 Dead but I could probably run that just fine with my current rig so it&apos;s not a concern.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m not looking to spend more than $200. I used to only buy ATI-branded cards but now I just want the most bang for my buck. Any recommendations?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105828</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 19:03:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diskeater</dc:creator>
		
			<category>midrange</category>
		
			<category>graphics</category>
		
			<category>card</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: SirStan</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105828/The-Wasteland-shouldnt-look-THIS-bad#1527891</link>	
		<description>You want ATI.  You have a budget.  Go buy the most expensive card you can afford.  Its pretty simple when you have it narrowed down like that.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There is a diminishing return on investment however where a $50-&amp;gt;$100 card is a bigger difference than a $100-$150 card, but im sure you know that.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/gaming-graphics-charts-q3-2008/Crysis-v1-21,752.html&quot;&gt;Tomshardware://Crysis&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/gaming-graphics-charts-q3-2008/Assassins-Creed-v1-02,739.html&quot;&gt;Tomshardware://Assasins Creed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&amp;DEPA=0&amp;Order=BESTMATCH&amp;Description=3870&amp;x=0&amp;y=0&quot;&gt;ATI 4870&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&amp;DEPA=0&amp;Order=BESTMATCH&amp;Description=3870+X2&amp;x=0&amp;y=0&quot;&gt;4870 X2&lt;/a&gt; seems like what you want.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOhhhh... My bad.  You said you dont care which vendor!  Well in that case... Simply look @ tomshwardware, and price each card.   I doubt (?) you want SLI... so the ATI X2 might be your best bet still... even the Nvidia 260 is pricier than the ATI series, and slower.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105828-1527891</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 19:31:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SirStan</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: junesix</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105828/The-Wasteland-shouldnt-look-THIS-bad#1527900</link>	
		<description>Tom&apos;s Hardware picked the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&amp;DEPA=0&amp;Order=BESTMATCH&amp;Description=Radeon+HD+4850&amp;x=13&amp;y=32&quot;&gt;Radeon HD 4850&lt;/a&gt; at around $170 in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/Best-Graphics-Card,2033-4.html&quot;&gt;their October lineup&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105828-1527900</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 19:38:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>junesix</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: doowod</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105828/The-Wasteland-shouldnt-look-THIS-bad#1527904</link>	
		<description>Radeon &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&amp;N=2000380048%201305520549%20106792627%201067940677&amp;name=Radeon%20HD%204850&quot;&gt;4850&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&amp;N=2000380048%201305520549%20106792627%201067940678&amp;name=Radeon%20HD%204870&quot;&gt;4870&lt;/a&gt;. That&apos;s a no brainer.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105828-1527904</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 19:46:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doowod</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: doowod</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105828/The-Wasteland-shouldnt-look-THIS-bad#1527905</link>	
		<description>And by no brainer, I mean &lt;a href=&quot;http://techreport.com/articles.x/14990&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105828-1527905</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 19:48:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doowod</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Diskeater</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105828/The-Wasteland-shouldnt-look-THIS-bad#1527945</link>	
		<description>Done and done. Picked up the Radeon 4850 @ Newegg for about $129 after a MIR. Not too bad.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105828-1527945</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 21:10:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diskeater</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: NormandyJack</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105828/The-Wasteland-shouldnt-look-THIS-bad#1528222</link>	
		<description>GOOD GOOD CALL! thats what I&apos;m running, and i love it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105828-1528222</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 07:02:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NormandyJack</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: BobbyDigital</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105828/The-Wasteland-shouldnt-look-THIS-bad#1528637</link>	
		<description>Enjoy Fallout 3, it is fantastic (once you get past the phase of the game immediately after leaving the vault &lt;that&gt; and the several hour long adjustment period afterwards wherein you figure out how you want to develop your character and play the game &lt;kind&gt;).&lt;/that&gt;&lt;/kind&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105828-1528637</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:56:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BobbyDigital</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: BobbyDigital</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105828/The-Wasteland-shouldnt-look-THIS-bad#1528644</link>	
		<description>Also I have an Nvidia 8800 GT, I know you were looking at ATI cards, and this is moot because I see you went with a Radeon.  But for anyone else looking I am very very happy with Nvida for this generation.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105828-1528644</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:59:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BobbyDigital</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
