<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Should I read Cryptonomicon before Quicksilver?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10558/Should-I-read-Cryptonomicon-before-Quicksilver/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Should I read Cryptonomicon before Quicksilver?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:59:42 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:59:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Should I read Cryptonomicon before Quicksilver?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10558/Should-I-read-Cryptonomicon-before-Quicksilver</link>	
		<description>NealStephensonFilter:  I just bought Quicksilver in the airport, am enjoying it, but curious if I should be reading Cryptonomicon first. Any opinions?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10558</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:40:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elsar</dc:creator>
		
			<category>NealStephenson</category>
		
			<category>Quicksilver</category>
		
			<category>BaroqueCycle</category>
		
			<category>Cryptonomicon</category>
		
			<category>books</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: dirtylittlemonkey</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10558/Should-I-read-Cryptonomicon-before-Quicksilver#190807</link>	
		<description>No.   The Baroque Cycle, though containing distant relatives of the characters in Cryptonomicon, is a standalone series.  Actually, I think you will enjoy Cryptonomicon more if you read it after the three books starting with Quicksilver.... only 3600 pages in all.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10558-190807</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:59:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dirtylittlemonkey</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ROU_Xenophobe</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10558/Should-I-read-Cryptonomicon-before-Quicksilver#190825</link>	
		<description>You don&apos;t need to have read &lt;i&gt;Cryptonomicon&lt;/i&gt; first.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But I&apos;d recommend it, weakly.  If you&apos;ve read &lt;i&gt;Cryptonomicon&lt;/i&gt; first, you&apos;ll recognize that So-and-so is Blah-de-blah from &lt;i&gt;C&lt;/i&gt;&apos;s ancestor.  Sometimes this won&apos;t be completely obvious at first meeting, either.  And you&apos;ll get a better introduction to Qwlghm, and some other details.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10558-190825</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:44:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ROU_Xenophobe</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: maniactown</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10558/Should-I-read-Cryptonomicon-before-Quicksilver#190864</link>	
		<description>No, you needn&apos;t read it first.  In fact, I think I might have liked the Baroque Cycle even better (if possible) if I hadn&apos;t read it until afterward.  Or maybe, I would have liked Cryptonomicon more after.  Either way, the series works on its own.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you like Quicksilver, just wait. The 2nd and 3rd books are so. much. better.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10558-190864</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:39:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maniactown</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jessamyn</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10558/Should-I-read-Cryptonomicon-before-Quicksilver#190882</link>	
		<description>Plus, even if you don&apos;t wind up liking Quicksilver, there is still a good chance you might like Cryptonomicon. Of the people I&apos;ve spoken to, people that only like one tend to like that one more.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10558-190882</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:19:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jjg</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10558/Should-I-read-Cryptonomicon-before-Quicksilver#190887</link>	
		<description>No, you should be reading Cryptonomicon instead.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10558-190887</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:23:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjg</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: elsar</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10558/Should-I-read-Cryptonomicon-before-Quicksilver#190895</link>	
		<description>why should i?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10558-190895</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:33:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elsar</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: hughbot</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10558/Should-I-read-Cryptonomicon-before-Quicksilver#190906</link>	
		<description>(Crypto Related Spoliers Within!)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Can someone answer me something about Cryptonomicon? So Enoch Root dies, right? But then he&apos;s alive again in the present? Was my copy missing a chapter?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(End Spoilers!)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10558-190906</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:59:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hughbot</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: vito90</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10558/Should-I-read-Cryptonomicon-before-Quicksilver#190912</link>	
		<description>You should read Cryptonomicon, not because it&apos;s required background, but because it&apos;s the best of his books.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Incidentally, just started The System of the World today!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10558-190912</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:18:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vito90</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ROU_Xenophobe</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10558/Should-I-read-Cryptonomicon-before-Quicksilver#190921</link>	
		<description>hughbot:  IIRC, a little bit of time elapses between when we see him &quot;die&quot; (or are we only assuming he dies?) and when he&apos;s carried out.  Who knows what Interesting Things might have taken place in that time?  Maybe the same sorts of things that Enoch did for Bobby Shaftoe on the island with giant lizards and Nipponese officers who ARE CARRYING FUCKING SWORDS!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10558-190921</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:48:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ROU_Xenophobe</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: John Shaft</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10558/Should-I-read-Cryptonomicon-before-Quicksilver#191031</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;why should i?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I have to admit, I&apos;m struggling to get involved in &lt;em&gt;Quicksilver&lt;/em&gt;, but I really enjoyed &lt;em&gt;Cryptonomicon&lt;/em&gt; (well, about 90% of it, until it turned into Tom Clancy-territory).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10558-191031</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:16:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Shaft</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
