<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Tao, thinking, and problem solving</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Tao, thinking, and problem solving</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:09:41 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:09:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Tao, thinking, and problem solving</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving</link>	
		<description>What exists out there that discusses Tao not in the context of self-help or meditation but rather how its philosophies bear on practical aspects of art, scientific thinking, skills requiring concentration, etc?  Case in point: it encourages an open mind and total awareness.  I&apos;ve read a good part of &lt;i&gt;Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance&lt;/i&gt; but it seems that&apos;s more about our relationship to technology.  Related non-Tao items of interest are fine.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105309</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:04:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>crapmatic</dc:creator>
		
			<category>science</category>
		
			<category>taoism</category>
		
			<category>tao</category>
		
			<category>zen</category>
		
			<category>motorcycle</category>
		
			<category>maintenance</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: Astro Zombie</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving#1521152</link>	
		<description>I used to have this book and it is a pretty good introduction to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.daoiststudies.org/review.little.php&quot;&gt;Tao-inspired art of China&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105309-1521152</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:09:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Astro Zombie</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: meso</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving#1521160</link>	
		<description>I would encourage you to read two books by a famous Zen Buddhist, Suzuki, who was one of the key theorists of Zen (although he wouldn&apos;t have appreciated that mention himself):&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Suzuki, Daisetz Teitaro&#160;(1969)&#160;An&#160;introduction&#160;to&#160;Zen&#160;Buddhism.&#160;London:&#160;Rider.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Suzuki, Daisetz Teitaro&#160;(1980)&#160;The&#160;Field&#160;of&#160;Zen.&#160;London:&#160;The&#160;Buddhist&#160;Society.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The first one will be the best to start out; it&apos;s very accessible, it has the occasional Buddhist jargon in it but it&apos;s always very well explained.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The second is more in depth.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Enjoy!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105309-1521160</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:15:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>meso</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: crapmatic</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving#1521195</link>	
		<description>(on further review I think maybe my question may have more to do with Zen Buddhism than Taoism -- my ignorance is showing here)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105309-1521195</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:45:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>crapmatic</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: phrakture</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving#1521203</link>	
		<description>I was actually a big fan of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060674695/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Tao is Silent&lt;/a&gt;. It is not about self-help, but more about shoe-horning the Eastern concept of the Tao into a Western mind.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105309-1521203</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:47:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrakture</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: phrakture</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving#1521213</link>	
		<description>Re: Zen Buddhism vs Taoism&lt;br&gt;
I think the pieces that you are looking to investigate are similar in both. Both encourage similar ways of thinking, with a different rationale and/or &quot;end goal&quot;. If you&apos;re looking specifically for &quot;mindfulness&quot; then you probably want to focus on Zen (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/081120104X/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Zen and the Birds of Appetite&lt;/a&gt; is a good start). If you&apos;re looking for more hardcore Eastern philosophy, I&apos;d recommend something regarding the Tao (see my previous recommendation).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Either way, I&apos;d highly recommend reading about both.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Special bonus: &lt;a href=&quot;http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/mirror/classics.mit.edu/Epictetus/epicench.html&quot;&gt;The Enchiridion&lt;/a&gt; is full of Eastern thinking that would fit in with your investigations, but was written by an ancient Greek with no Eastern influence. It&apos;s well worth the read.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105309-1521213</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:52:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrakture</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: symbollocks</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving#1521265</link>	
		<description>My favorite translation of the tao is &lt;a href=&quot;http://naturyl.humanists.net/taotext.html&quot;&gt;The Plain English Adaptation&lt;/a&gt;. It&apos;s in really simple, very clear language.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here&apos;s a good article on why &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oftwominds.com/blogjun08/survival6-08.html&quot;&gt;survivalist thinking doesn&apos;t work&lt;/a&gt;, according to the tao. Relevant excerpt:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The Taoists developed their philosophy during an extended era of turmoil known as the Warring States period of Chinese history. One of their main principles runs something like this: if you&apos;re tall and stout and strong, then you&apos;ll call attention to yourself. And because you&apos;re rigid--that is, what looks like strength at first glance--then when the wind rises, it snaps you right in half.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you&apos;re thin and ordinary and flexible, like a willow reed, then you&apos;ll bend in the wind, and nobody will notice you. You&apos;ll survive while the &quot;strong&quot; will be broken, either by unwanted attention or by being brittle.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105309-1521265</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:27:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>symbollocks</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: desjardins</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving#1521284</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I&apos;ve read a good part of Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance but it seems that&apos;s more about our relationship to technology.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
yer not doin it right&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Seriously, Pirsig is only using the motorcycle analogy as a portal to much more metaphysical realm. I&apos;d recommend a re-read.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There are lots of books like The Zen of Archery, The Zen of Cooking, The Zen of Clipping Your Toenails, etc., but I suspect that&apos;s not what you&apos;re really after.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Two good, really accessible books that incorporate Zen into daily life: &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0062511173/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Nothing Special&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; by Charlotte Joko Beck, and &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1590301420/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Start Where You Are&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; by Pema Chodron. I haven&apos;t read Buddhism Without Beliefs but it may address your interest. There&apos;s also a book about art that is not specifically Zen but has that feel to it. &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1585421472/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Artist&apos;s Way&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt; Also, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/086171380X/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Hardcore Zen&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; addresses how Zen alters the &quot;mundane&quot; experiences of everyday life. This was written by a Westerner and is extremely accessible for the layperson.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105309-1521284</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:37:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>desjardins</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: plinth</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving#1521334</link>	
		<description>Seconding The Tao is Silent.  The thing that makes it stand out is to me that the author, Raymond Smullyan, is a logician.  Have a logician explain the Tao through logic is an interesting piece of cognitive dissonance.  I suppose that Smullyan himself would probably say something like, &quot;The Tao is not logical nor is the Tao logic, but all logic comes from the Tao.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105309-1521334</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:31:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>plinth</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: flabdablet</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving#1521512</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I&apos;ve read a good part of Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance but it seems that&apos;s more about our relationship to technology&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Read it again, with an open mind and total awareness.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105309-1521512</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:52:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>flabdablet</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Kid Charlemagne</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving#1521660</link>	
		<description>Godel, Escher, Bach - It&apos;s about AI, which makes it about thought itself.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105309-1521660</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:45:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kid Charlemagne</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: pointilist</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving#1521782</link>	
		<description>I haven&apos;t read much about the Dao and I haven&apos;t studied it much either. It seems a contradiction. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I stayed at a Zen center for a couple of winters and maybe I got nothing out of it. Nevertheless, I think &quot;The Tao Is Silent&quot; is a strong recommendation because it intimates the non-intellectual vantage point necessary for this pursuit. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0375705090/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Zen in the Art of Archery&lt;/a&gt; many years ago and it meant a lot to me. It is probably dated now. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Nthing the sentiment that if you can&apos;t translate from tech to whatever, then you are missing the point. Being specific is not what it is about. &quot;The Dao that can be spoken is not the Dao.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105309-1521782</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:02:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pointilist</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: pointilist</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving#1521786</link>	
		<description>oh, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rhymeswithorange.com/index.php?date=20081004&amp;view_comic=Get+Comic&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105309-1521786</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:11:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pointilist</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: SheMulp AKA Plus 1</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving#1523596</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.maui.net/~zen_gtr/about.html&quot;&gt;Zen Guitar Dojo&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105309-1523596</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:35:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SheMulp AKA Plus 1</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: snuffleupagus</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving#1525350</link>	
		<description>You might consider &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0525244581/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Tao of Pooh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1405204273/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Te of Piglet.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Also, Lao Tzu&apos;s own writings (the &lt;em&gt;Tao Te Ching&lt;/em&gt; itself) aren&apos;t difficult to read, you just may not get much out of it without some exposure to the concepts first. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The Zen links are nice, but Taoism is not Zen.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105309-1525350</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:54:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>snuffleupagus</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: fcummins</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105309/Tao-thinking-and-problem-solving#1529780</link>	
		<description>For recent brushes between cognitive science and Taoism, you might look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0262112914/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Complementary Nature&lt;/a&gt; by Scott Kelso.  Similarly, and somewhat older, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0262720213/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Embodied Mind&lt;/a&gt; by Varela, Thompson and Rosch draws on Neuroscience, Psychology and Buddhism.  Much of Francesco Varela&apos;s writing is relevant, as perhaps is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindandlife.org/&quot;&gt;Mind and Life Institute&lt;/a&gt;, which brings together Buddhists and Scientists.   Also a &lt;a href=&quot;http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/&quot;&gt;self-plug&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105309-1529780</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:48:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fcummins</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
