<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: WSXGA+ LED, where art thou?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105127/WSXGA-LED-where-art-thou/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post WSXGA+ LED, where art thou?</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 04:09:29 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 04:09:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: WSXGA+ LED, where art thou?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105127/WSXGA-LED-where-art-thou</link>	
		<description>LongshotFilter: Does anyone know if any 15.4&quot; WSXGA+ panels with LED backlights are coming to market soon? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; As far as I can tell, no one is selling a 15.4&quot; laptop with a WSXGA+ (1650x1080) LED-backlit screen (I&apos;d love to be proven wrong!).  I know it&apos;s unlikely, but does anyone out there have any idea if there&apos;s one in development or coming to market any time soon?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My current alternatives are basically 1440x900 LED or 1650x1080 CCFL, and I just can&apos;t make up my mind between the two.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105127</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:16:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>knave</dc:creator>
		
			<category>notebook</category>
		
			<category>laptop</category>
		
			<category>wsxga</category>
		
			<category>led</category>
		
			<category>ccfl</category>
		
			<category>lcd</category>
		
			<category>display</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: Mike1024</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105127/WSXGA-LED-where-art-thou#1519268</link>	
		<description>I assume you&apos;ve come across &lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=291152&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt; already?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I had a 17&quot; laptop with a resolution of 1650x1080 and things were &lt;i&gt;small&lt;/i&gt;. If you got the same resolution at 15&quot; you can expect things to be &lt;i&gt;very small&lt;/i&gt;. Now, it is possible to set your OS to &quot;large fonts&quot; mode and suchlike, but you probably want to try out large fonts mode before buying a laptop which will need it full time.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105127-1519268</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 04:09:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike1024</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: flabdablet</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105127/WSXGA-LED-where-art-thou#1519301</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ve been running assorted flavors of Linux on my Dell Inspiron 8200, which has a 15&quot; 1600x1200 screen, since 2001.  The extra resolution has always made things look better, not worse, because Linux&apos;s screen rendering basically &lt;em&gt;works&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Windows, on the other hand, does not cope at all well with DPI settings much over 96.  Lots of things look terrible.  Even leaving the DPI set at the standard 96 and turning on Extra Large Fonts breaks some apps.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So if you&apos;re going to run the crappy operating system, get the crappy screen.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105127-1519301</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:36:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>flabdablet</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: knave</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/105127/WSXGA-LED-where-art-thou#1519314</link>	
		<description>Mike1024, I currently run 1920x1200 on a 17&quot; laptop (for two and a half years now).  I use 1650x1080 on a 15.4&quot; Thinkpad at work and I like it.  So, basically, I&apos;m aware of the resolution.  In fact, one of the options is 1920x1200 LED on a 15.4&quot;, and that would be way too high resolution for my eyes, so I&apos;m not considering it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.105127-1519314</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 07:28:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>knave</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
