Comments on: Who said it's funner to interpret people so you can agree with them?

Question: Who said it's funner to interpret people so you can agree with them?

rwhe — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:10:54 -0800

QuotationFilter: Who said it's more fun to construe people so that you can agree with them, than to argue with them? (I believe this was couched as a private mental game useful for dealing with boors.)

By: acro

acro — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:54:14 -0800

Robert McNamara? "Answer the question you wish they'd asked."

By: rwhe

rwhe — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:16:20 -0800

Thanks, but that's not it. It is Sarah Palin's primary debating strategy, however...

Can anyone else help? AskMeFi, don't fail me now!

By: tangerine

tangerine — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:30:39 -0800

I wonder if you're thinking of George Miller, frequently quoted in various contexts by Suzette Hadin Elgin.

Psychologist George Miller long ago said something so important that I call it Miller's Law; he said, "In order to understand what another person is saying, you must assume that it is true and try to find out what it could be true of." That is, when somebody says, "Hey! My toaster talks to me!", your proper response is a neutral "Oh? What does your toaster say?" Followed by careful listening, with your full attention. You're not accepting as true the statement that the person's toaster talks to him or her; you're assuming temporarily that it is true, and then you're listening carefully to find out what the statement could be true of.

By: rwhe

rwhe — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:10:17 -0800

tangerine, that wasn't the quotation, but it's pretty close in concept and spirit to the one i was thinking of. The quotation I have in mind was a bit more playful, and I think it implied you ought to construe the speaker's remarks as true even if you can't obtain feedback from the speaker.

Thanks!

By: rwhe

rwhe — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:15:52 -0800

tangerine: On second thought, bingo! I googled Miller's Law and found the more concise and witty version I remembered:

"In order to understand what another person is saying, you must assume that it is true, and try to imagine what it could be true of."

You made my day. Thank you very much!

By: rwhe

rwhe — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:18:44 -0800

Um, if I had read your answer more carefully, I would have seen you used the same quotation I did. I got lost in that stuff about toasters.

Sorry, and thanks again!

By: eritain

eritain — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:46:06 -0800

Of course, some people think it's more fun to do much the opposite.