Help clarify The Sociological Imagination
October 13, 2008 6:44 PM Subscribe
Help clarify C. Wright Mill's "The Sociological Imagination" to me!
So I've been doing some reading into traditional sociology, and Mills' concept of the sociological imagination is, of course, a classic. It seems to base its idea of the ideal quality of mind around the continual use of three questions to examine every social situation:
1. what is the structure of this society or web of social relations?
2. what is this society's place in context of human history?
3. who is prevalent in this society?
I'm okay with number 2 and 3, but I'm a bit stuck in terms of 'the structure of this society'. The original text, and other sources I've found via google, talk about "the essential components", "how they relate to one another", "how it differs from other varieties of social order".
I'm sort of interpreting "the essential components" to mean something along the lines of the various 'institutions' found in society - e.g. government, education, the family unit, etc., but I get the feeling this interpretation is a bit broad and not really conducive to developing my own sociological imagination. Do you have any tips or analogies that could clarify this for me?
Thanks!
So I've been doing some reading into traditional sociology, and Mills' concept of the sociological imagination is, of course, a classic. It seems to base its idea of the ideal quality of mind around the continual use of three questions to examine every social situation:
1. what is the structure of this society or web of social relations?
2. what is this society's place in context of human history?
3. who is prevalent in this society?
I'm okay with number 2 and 3, but I'm a bit stuck in terms of 'the structure of this society'. The original text, and other sources I've found via google, talk about "the essential components", "how they relate to one another", "how it differs from other varieties of social order".
I'm sort of interpreting "the essential components" to mean something along the lines of the various 'institutions' found in society - e.g. government, education, the family unit, etc., but I get the feeling this interpretation is a bit broad and not really conducive to developing my own sociological imagination. Do you have any tips or analogies that could clarify this for me?
Thanks!
This thread is closed to new comments.
I think that's what Mills was getting at with structure: that is, the degree of integration of different social institutions or forms. I read Giddens with Bill Sewell at Chicago in the 1990s; you might find Sewell's article "A Theory of Structure," now available in his Logics of History, useful as you puzzle through this point. Structure is one of those metaphors that is inescapable yet difficult to pin down.
posted by brianogilvie at 7:16 PM on October 13, 2008