<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Win2k Image Previews</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10215/Win2k-Image-Previews/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Win2k Image Previews</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:42:23 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:42:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Win2k Image Previews</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10215/Win2k-Image-Previews</link>	
		<description>Is there anyway I can get the image previewing from Windows XP on Win 2k? If not, are there any alternatives? I tried ACDSee and found it too bloated.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10215</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:34:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Orange Goblin</dc:creator>
		
			<category>imagepreviewing</category>
		
			<category>windowsxp</category>
		
			<category>xp</category>
		
			<category>windows</category>
		
			<category>win2k</category>
		
			<category>acdsee</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: DaShiv</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10215/Win2k-Image-Previews#186058</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.irfanview.com/&quot;&gt;IrfanView&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10215-186058</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:42:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DaShiv</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: TuxHeDoh</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10215/Win2k-Image-Previews#186071</link>	
		<description>I second the suggestion for IrfanView.  I was looking for this exact thing last week, before finding IrfanView.  It&apos;s so much better than the image preview for XP, you can actually edit images, and batch process, and batch rename, and...  it&apos;s very cool.  Until last week I had never really seen it&apos;s appeal.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10215-186071</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:03:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TuxHeDoh</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: TurkishGolds</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10215/Win2k-Image-Previews#186076</link>	
		<description>I like to use old, abandonware versions of ACDSee.  The same functionality, but far less bloated.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10215-186076</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:13:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TurkishGolds</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: smackfu</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10215/Win2k-Image-Previews#186084</link>	
		<description>I use an old version of ACDSee too.  Irfanview doesn&apos;t have the file manager which I use constantly.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10215-186084</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:44:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smackfu</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: majick</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10215/Win2k-Image-Previews#186172</link>	
		<description>I third the old ACDSee.  It was a kickass application before they added all the crap.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10215-186172</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 20:26:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>majick</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: codger</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10215/Win2k-Image-Previews#186178</link>	
		<description>I third the suggestion to irfanview. I have been using it happily for over six years. It just recently got upgraded with some rudimentary functionality to add text to images, and I found myself using that exact feature just today.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As for a file manager, I&apos;m more than happy with Explorer. YMMV.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10215-186178</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 20:50:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>codger</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: madman</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10215/Win2k-Image-Previews#186216</link>	
		<description>Where can I find an old version of ACDSee now? :(</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10215-186216</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 01:18:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madman</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: kev23f</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10215/Win2k-Image-Previews#186224</link>	
		<description>madman, i think you can get it from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.handyarchive.com/Multimedia/Image-Viewers/711-ACDSee-Classic.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10215-186224</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 02:38:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kev23f</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Mitheral</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10215/Win2k-Image-Previews#186348</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m fond of &lt;a href=&quot;http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pierre.g/xnview/enhome.html&quot;&gt;XnView&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It&apos;s free as in beer and opens &lt;b&gt;everything&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10215-186348</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:08:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitheral</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Civil_Disobedient</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10215/Win2k-Image-Previews#186384</link>	
		<description>ACDSee 3.1 is the fishizzle.  Just make sure when you install it to disable the extra &quot;Digital Camera&quot; crap, as well as the &quot;ZIP extension&quot; crap.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10215-186384</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:22:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Civil_Disobedient</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: majick</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10215/Win2k-Image-Previews#186388</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot; i think you can get it from here.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That looks like the later crap-filled version.  Thumbnails?  WTF?  The screenshot on that site doesn&apos;t look a thing like ACDSee is supposed to.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If the &lt;i&gt;real&lt;/i&gt; old version of ACDSee doesn&apos;t turn up (sorry, I&apos;ve long since lost mine, or I&apos;d play shareware), I second XnView as an excellent alternative.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10215-186388</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:28:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>majick</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: kev23f</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10215/Win2k-Image-Previews#186742</link>	
		<description>majick - you probably dont care, but i just installed that and it is not the &quot;crap filled version&quot;, it is the minimal old version. And i&apos;m not sure what you mean about thumbnails, this view can be enabled or disabled as you wish . And it does look exactly like the old AcdSee. Anyway lots of other good suggestions here...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10215-186742</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 02:55:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kev23f</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
